Tag: age of the earth

  • Answering a Smear

    Vaughn Mancha is an Old Earth Creationist who frequently posts on Facebook.

    Here are snaps of three of his posts, in which he smears Young Earth Creationists. In them he locates the foundation of Young Earth Creationism in the visions of a New England woman some 160 years ago. In another post, he finds that the work of young earth creationist Henry Morris is also rooted in these same visions.

    Mr. Mancha implies that people who think the earth is less than multiple billions of years old are kooks and heretics, or lack the discernment to know this.

    In Mr. Mancha’s world, Young Earth Creationists are not trying to interpret the Bible as best they can; instead, they are merely automatons following delusional people.

    Young earth creationists take the Bible seriously. If you take the Word of God seriously, you would look to it for clues on how old the earth is. An honest evaluation of the text of scripture might generate a range of possible ages of the earth.

    But Old Earth Creationists obediently limit their estimates to a range acceptable to the secular, pagan culture.

    They let pagans determine how the Word of God is to be interpreted.

    It isn’t surprising that the secular, pagan culture wants to set the delimiters.

    But it is mystifying to me that there are professing Christians who are eager to comply with the opinions of people who are devoted to a narrative that excludes the God of the Bible.

  • Uniformitarian Assumptions, Part 1: Moon recession

    Uniformitarian assumptions are frequently used in creating estimates of the age of the earth and the universe.

    A scientist measures current processes, and extrapolates those processes into the past to make an estimate of the age of the earth.

    A Uniformitarian assumption is an assumption that the way things are right now, are the way things have always been.

    It is a reasonable assumption, to a point, but there are cases where uniformitarian assumptions fail.

    Moon recession is a case where the uniformitarian assumption has a limited range of applicability.

    The moon is known to be receding away from the earth at a rate of 1.5 inches per year. That is the current rate. Physics tells us that the recession rate would have been faster in the past. If we extrapolate backwards, the moon would have been in contact with the earth 1.5 billion years ago.

    No one thinks this happened, because it would have been catastrophic for life on the planet. But if 1.5B years is absurd, then even more so is the standard old-earth assumption of 4.5B years.

    Clearly the uniformitarian assumption is valid only within a limited range, and we don’t really know where that range begins.

    https://www.space.com/moon-drifting-away-from-earth-2-5-billion-years

    https://answersingenesis.org/astronomy/moon/lunar-recession/?srsltid=AfmBOoqWrD1iota4wJGENIz4coVM3GjrYfk36yEwfVSQ2gP8olZRfuMr